Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41746 (KAR)

MR. ASHRAF @ ASHRAF SALMARA @ TARAKARI ASHRAF v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5819/2024 · 2026-09-18

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010315962024 NC: 2026:KHC:51201 CRL.P No. 5819 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5819 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MR. ASHRAF @ ASHRAF SALMARA @ TARAKARI ASHRAF S/O. IDDIKUNHI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. BENGARAKATTE SALUMARA HOUSE, PARENKI VILLAGE,D.K.-574 214. 2. MR. MEHRAJ S/O. HUSAINAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. MADENJARU HOUSE, MACHINA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.-574 214. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MAHAMMAD ANWAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICE, PUNJALKATTE POLICE STATION, BELTHANGADY TALUK, REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010315962024 NC: 2026:KHC:51201 CRL.P No. 5819 of 2024 2. MAHAMMAD NAZEER S/O. ABDUL KHADAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O KALLAGUDDE HOUSE, MACHINA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA, KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.PC. PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CR.NO.7/2020 DATED 15.01.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE A AND D ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1095/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-C FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323,504 R/W 34 OF IPC PERTAINING TO PUNJALKATTE P.S., PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE COURT OF ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C COURT BELTHANGADY D.K. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call. 2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 11.11.2024. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since two years. It seems that the petitioners are not interested - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010315962024 NC: 2026:KHC:51201 CRL.P No. 5819 of 2024 in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. 3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7