Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41745 (CAL)

ASIT MAZUMDER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3204/2026 · 2026-09-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 D/L 245 17.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (A) 3204 of 2026 Asit Mazumder Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Serampore Police Station Case No. 504 of 2026 dated 02.09.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/118(1)/118(2)/126(2)/127(2)/132/190/191(2)/191(3) /221/324(4)/351(2)/351(3) of the BNS, 2023 And In the matter of : Asit Mazumder ……Petitioner. Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh Mr. Md. Danish Farooqui …for the Petitioner Mr. Kallol Mondal, P.P, Sr. Adv Mr. Sayak Chakraborty Mr. Aditya Tiwari Mr. Anamitra Banerjee Mr. Pritam Roy …for the State 1. Petitioner has preferred an application for anticipatory bail. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR nor the materials till date which has been collected do reveal any incriminating material for the petitioner to apprehend that he may be implicated in the present case. 2 3. In view of the State’s stand, I direct that if the Investigating Officer of the case warrants the custody of the petitioner at least seven days notice be provided to the petitioner for exhausting the remedies available under the law. 4. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 3204 of 2026 is disposed of. 5. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 6. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)