WP No. 23401 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 23401 of 2026 A.Syed Imdad Ali ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. District Collector, District Collectorate, Villupuram District. 2. District Revenue Officer, Office of District Revenue Officer, Villupuram District. 3. The Sub-Collector, Office of Sub-Collector, Dindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 4. Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Sirukadambur, Gingee, Villupuram District. 5. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to issue Patta in respect of the property comprised in S.No.68/4, Sirukadambur Village, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District measuring an extent of 0.62.5 Ares (1 acre 65 cents) in favour of the Kabarasthan Wakf Sirukadambur village, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23401 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District as sought vide representation dated 06.11.2024 in light of proceedings of the 4th respondent dated 05.12.2024 in Na.Ka.No.A1/2118/2024. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.A.Nassir Hussain For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel, for RR-1 to 4 Ms.N.Swathi Priya Raj, for R5 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 06.11.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 06.11.2024 before the fourth respondent to issue patta in respect of the property, more-fully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, in favour of Kabarasthan Wakf, Sirukadambur village, Gingee taluk, Villupuram district. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents1 to 4 and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 06.11.2024 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23401 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents 1 to 3 to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.11.2024, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Villupuram District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Office of District Revenue Officer, Villupuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23401 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 3. The Sub-Collector, Office of Sub-Collector, Dindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. 4. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Sirukadambur, Gingee, Villupuram District. 5. The Chief Executive Officer, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23401 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 23401 of 2026 19-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis