- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13027-DB RFA No. 620 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 620 OF 2014 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHANNAMMA W/O LATE JAVARAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 2. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE JAVARAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 3. SRI GOVINDA S/O LATE JAVARAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 4. SRI VENKATARAMU S/O LATE JAVARAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 5. SRI SOMANNA S/O LATE JAVARAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 6. SRI SHIVANNA S/O LATE JAVARAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 1 TO 6 ARE R/O GUDDENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK. 7. SMT. BALAMMA W/O LATE JAVARAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/O MALLADEVARAPURA Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13027-DB RFA No. 620 of 2014 VILLAGE, KATTAYA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK - 573 201. &APPELLANTS (BY SRI L. SRINIVASA BABU, ADV., -ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI RANGAIAAH S/O LATE BALAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 2. SRI BALARAJ S/O RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS. 3. SRI KANTHARAJ S/O RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS. 1 TO 3 ARE R/O GUDDENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK - 573 201. 4. SMT. HOMBALAMMA W/O LATE BALAIAH MAJOR R/O DODDABAGANAHALLYU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK - 573 201. 5. SMT. SASUNAMMA W/O LATE BALAIAH MAJOR R/O KAMANAHALLY VILLAGE SALAGAME HOBLI HASSAN TALUK - 573 201. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SRIKARA P.K, ADV.) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.46/2011, ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND DECLARATION. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13027-DB RFA No. 620 of 2014 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) None has appeared in the first round as well as in the second round. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE KK