Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4173 (CHH)

SMT. SUNITA CHALAKI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9247/2023 · 2026-04-01

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15398 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9247 of 2023 1 - Smt. Sunita Chalaki D/o Shri Manorath Chalaki W/o Budaru Ram Nag Aged About 35 Years R/o Lal Bahadur Shastri Ward No. 8, Aamagudapara, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Revenue And Rehabilitation Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (Nmdc) Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Nmdc Limited, Khanij Bhavan, Castle Hills, Masab Tank, Hyderabad- 500173 3 - Chief General Manager (Personnel) National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (Nmdc) Iron And Steel Plant, Post- Nagarnar, District Bastar (Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Managing Director National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (Nmdc) Iron And Steel Plant, Post- Nagarnar, District Bastar (Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Jagdalpur, Bastar, District- Bastar (Jagdalpur) (C.G.) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. A.G.. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. T.L. Bareth, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 02/04/2026 1. None appears for the petitioner to argue the case even in second round, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat