[2026:RJ-JP:15184] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 163/2026 Tayyab Ali Son Of Mohammad Rafiq, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of B 136, Mohanlal Sukhadiya Avasiya Yojna (Shakeel Bhai Ka Makan), P.S. Nanta, Kota City. (Accused Appellant Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota) ---Accused-Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Rohit Meghwal Son Of Shobharam Meghwal, Resident Of C-164, Mohanlal Sukhadiya, Nanta, Kota City, Rajasthan. ---Complainant-Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sunil Vijay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/04/2026 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 145/2025 Police Station Nanta, District Kota City for the offences under Sections 115(2), 109(2), 126(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 115(2), 109(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(2)(v), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act dismissed the bail application before it. [2026:RJ-JP:15184] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-163/2026] 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is submitted that Javed, is stated to be main accused and that appellant is in custody ever since 14.07.2025. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant appeal and has submitted that the appellant has criminal antecedents as reproduced hereinbelow, registered against him. ्ቅ. सं. ्ቚकरण सं्ቅा धारा थाना विरण 1. 258/2017 323, 341, 504 आई.पी.सी वि्ሺान नगर पेंडिविंग को्቏ 2. 138/2021 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 307, 458 आई.पी.सी कोताली बूंदी पेंडिविंग को्቏ 3. 16/2022 341, 323, 324, 34 आई.पी.सी सदर ्቏ोंक पेंडिविंग को्቏ 4. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering that Javed is main accused and present appellant is brother of the main accused; that name of the appellant is mentioned in the FIR; that injuries sustained by the complainant are serious and life threatening in nature therefore provisions of Section 109 of BNS are attracted; that there are criminal antecedents registered against the appellant and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the criminal appeal. 5. Consequently, the instant criminal appeal is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /s-212