- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628302026 NC: 2026:KHC:52980 WP No. 28764 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 28764 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.M.R.LAKSHMIKANTHA, W/O N.K.MURTHY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. SRI.N.K.MURTHY S/O M.N.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3. SMT. VARALAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE M.N.KRISHNAPPA W/O LATE N.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT MANDIBELE VILLAGE VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 135 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI CHOKKAREDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.INDIRA S.R. W/O KESHAVA RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 2. SRI. KESHAVA RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAPPA.P AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628302026 NC: 2026:KHC:52980 WP No. 28764 of 2026 BOTH ARE R/AT MANDIBELE VILLAGE VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK …RESPONDENTS (VIDE ORDER DATED 24.09.2026 NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING ANNEXURE-A DATED 29-08-2026, BY NON GRANTING EXPARTE INTERIM ORDER IN I.A.NO.1, FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN O.S.NO.429/2026, PENDING IN CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER The petitioners instituted the suit seeking a decree of permanent injunction and filed I.A. No.1/2026 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’), seeking an ex parte ad interim temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the suit schedule property. The trial Court, by the impugned order, directed issuance of notice on I.A. No.1/2026 as well as on the suit. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628302026 NC: 2026:KHC:52980 WP No. 28764 of 2026 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the suit schedule property is agricultural land with standing crops. It is further submitted that the defendants are attempting to interfere with the petitioners’ possession and, if such interference is not prevented, the standing crops are likely to be affected. 3. Considering the limited relief sought, this Court proposes to dispense with notice to the respondents. 4. By way of ad interim relief, both parties are directed to maintain status quo till consideration of I.A. No.1/2026 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC. The trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the said application and dispose of the same within an outer limit of two months from the next date of hearing, i.e., 29.10.2026. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE VBS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37