[2026:RJ-JP:12272] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 3870/2026 Anil Sharma S/o Ramswaroop Sharma, R/o Mali Ki Kothi, Agra Road, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur East. ( Presently Confined At Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prameshwar Lal Pilania For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.1164/2024 registered with the Police Station Kanota, Jaipur City (East) for offence under Sections 189(2), 190, 191(3), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 351(3) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record, including the charge-sheet. 4. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submitted that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of preparing forged documents that is an affidavit of stamp paper of Rs.100/- [2026:RJ-JP:12272] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3870/2026] on the basis of which the revenue authorities opened mutation in the name of co-accused- Kallu Sharma. He further submitted that co-accused Kallu Sharma preferred S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.7717/2025 and the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.12.2025 stayed the arrest of co-accused Kallu Sharma, who is actual beneficiary of the alleged forged document, which is said to have been prepared by the accused-petitioner. He also submits that the Police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and trial will take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner and also the fact that the accused petitioner is in custody since long, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This second bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /13