BBR (INDIA) PVT LTD., v. MFAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD.,
CMP/308/2025 · 2026-04-02
E S Indiresh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4168 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4168 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18086 CMP No. 308 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 308 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
BBR (INDIA) PVT LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. SHIVA KUMAR AGARWAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO.318, FIRST FLOOR, 15TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560080. EMAIL. bbrindia@bbrindia.co.in &PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHRAYANSH SINGH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
MFAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18086 CMP No. 308 of 2025
REPRESENTATIVE REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.8 AND 8A, AVS COMPOUND, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU- 560034.
&RESPONDENT
(SERVICE OF NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS H/S V/O DATED 05.02.2026)
THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, PRAYING TO APPOINT AN INDEPENDENT AND IMPARTIAL ARBITRATOR UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 TO ADJUDICATE THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARISING OUT OF THE WORK ORDERS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18086 CMP No. 308 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. Notice issued to the respondent is held sufficient.
3. In this petition, the petitioner has sought for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the work orders, in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 8Act9).
4. Having taken note of the submission made by the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and as Clause-44 of the work order dated 19.08.2017 (Annexure-P7) provides for appointment of an Arbitrator, I am of the considered opinion that, an Arbitrator is to be appointed to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.
5. Accordingly, this petition under Section 11(6) of the Act, 1996 is allowed. Sri. Vishwanath.V.Angadi, Retired District Judge is appointed to enter into the said reference of Arbitration and act as the Sole Arbitrator in the present case in
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18086 CMP No. 308 of 2025
the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, Bengaluru, as per the Rules governing the said Arbitration Centre.
6. All claims and contentions of the parties are kept open to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.
7. A copy of this order be sent forthwith to the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, Khanija Bhavan, Bengaluru, for proceeding further in the matter.
8. Registry is directed to return all original documents produced by any of the parties after obtaining Photostat copies of the same.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30