Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4167 (RAJ)

KHALID AHMED S/O ABDUL LATIF v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3965/2026 · 2026-03-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10735] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3965/2026 Khalid Ahmed S/o Abdul Latif, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Khanpura Road, Chishti Nagar, Police Station Ramganj District Ajmer. (At Present In Judicial Custody In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.241/2025 registered at Police Station Ramganj (Ajmer), District Ajmer for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. In the present matter, no specific allegation has been made against the petitioner. The only allegation is that he purchased the land from the complainant. It is submitted that the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser and has been behind bars since 06.02.2026. Though two criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner but he has been acquitted in both cases. The case is exclusively triable by the [2026:RJ-JP:10735] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3965/2026] Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, accordingly, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Khalid Ahmed S/o Abdul Latif, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/65