SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:569 BA1 No. 2132 of 2025 Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait han i, J. Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the Applicant through video conferencing. 2. Mr. B.N. Maulekhi, learned D.A.G. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant - Shubham Sati, aged about 27 years, S/o Sh. Shambhu Prasad Sati, R/o Mankhi, Tehsil Nandanagar Ghat, District Chamoli, presently residing at Lane No. 09, Aman Vihar, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. The Applicant is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 187 of 2025, registered at Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun, under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, 1959. 4. Heard Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the Applicant through video conferencing, and Mr. B.N. Maulekhi, learned D.A.G. for the State, and perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the Applicant is not named in the FIR and no credible evidence has been collected by the Investigating Officer to establish the involvement of the present Applicant in the alleged offence. No test identification parade, as required under law, was conducted, thereby rendering the implication of the Applicant unreliable. It is further submitted that there is no independent eyewitness to the alleged incident and the Applicant has no previous criminal antecedents. The Applicant has been in judicial custody since 27.09.2025. 6. On the other hand, learned Brief Holder for the State has opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegations, the absence of direct evidence connecting the Applicant with the alleged offence, the fact that the Applicant was not named in the FIR, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court is of the view that the Applicant deserves to be released on bail at this stage. 8. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the Applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. 10. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) Vacation Judge 16.01.2026 Shiksha