Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4165 (RAJ)

RAKESH KUMAR S/O SH. RAMSINGH, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/281/2023 · 2026-04-10

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15247] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 281/2023 Rakesh Kumar S/o Sh. Ramsingh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gram Budhibawal, Police Station Khushkheda, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Rajesh Kumar S.i. S/o Surat Singh Yadav, R/o Village Babas, Tehsil Patodi District Gurgaon (Haryana) At Present S.h.o. Khushkheda District Police Bhiwadai District Alwar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 10/04/2026 ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk [kq'k[ksMk ¼ftyk iqfyl fHkokMh½ ftyk vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 238@2021 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471] 120 ch Hkk-na-la- dks fujLr djus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh@ ihfMr@vkgrx.k }kjk la;qDr :i ls ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds chp esa vkilh LoSfPNd lgefr ds vk/kkj ij jkthukek gks pqdk gSA nksuksa i{kksa ds chp lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k gSa] vijk/k t?kU; o xaHkhj izd`fr dk ugha gS] vr% mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o mlds vk/kkj ij lafLFkr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd;k tkosA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA muds }kjk rF;kRed fjiksVZ izLrqr dh x;h] ftlds lkFk [2026:RJ-JP:15247] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-281/2023] iqfyl ds le{k vfHk;qDrx.k o vkgrx.k@ihfMr@ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr jkthukes dks rLnhd dj izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA orZeku ekeys esa vijk/k xaHkhj o t?kU; izd`fr dk ugha gSA i{kdkjku~ ds e/; lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k LFkkfir gks pqds gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vuqla/kku vFkok vfHk;kstu dks fujUrj j[ks tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS] vr% ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksdj mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij ntZ vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk ;kphx.k ds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk [kq'k[ksMk ¼ftyk iqfyl fHkokMh½ ftyk vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 238@2021 dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /264-S