[2026:RJ-JP:16355] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3102/2026 1. Jitendra S/o Prithviraj, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gram Jaoldi, Police Station Taleda, District Bundi Raj. 2. Prithviraj S/o Govinda, Aged About 74 Years, R/o Gram Jaoldi, Police Station Taleda, District Bundi Raj. ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Laddha with Mr. Naman Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 17/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the present criminal misc. bail application qua petitioner-Jitendra. 2. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. bail application qua petitioner-Jitendra is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 323/2025 registered at Police Station Talera, District Bundi, for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner- Prithviraj has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is a senior citizen of 74 years of age; the injuries sustained by the injured person are attributed to co-accused Rajendra, Ramcharan [2026:RJ-JP:16355] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3102/2026] and other persons. He further submits that co-accused Ankit, Virendra and Rajendra have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No.721/2026, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS. 5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by accused-petitioner hereinabove. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that petitioner- Prithviraj has no criminal antecedent; injuries sustained by the injured person are attributed to co-accused Rajendra, Ramcharan and other persons; co-accused Ankit, Virendra and Rajendra have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No.721/2026. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner- Prithviraj. 7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of Prithviraj S/o Govinda, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station in FIR No. 323/2025 on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; [2026:RJ-JP:16355] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3102/2026] (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and; (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/82