Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41629 (PAT)

Vijay Pratap Ray v. The State of Bihar

MJC/3508/2023 · 2026-01-16

Mohit Kumar Shah

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3508 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23988 of 2019 ====================================================== Vijay Pratap Ray Son of Ram Bahadur Ray, resident of Village-Tenuaj, P.O. and P.S.-Natwar, Dinara, District-Rohtas (Sasaram), Bihar-802218. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Shri Brijesh Mehrotra, son of not known, Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Shri Navin Kumar, the Collector, Rohtas, Sasaram. 3. Shri Upendra Kumar Pal, the Sub Divisional Officer, Bikramganj, Rohtas. 4. Shri Aditya Kumar Singh, the Circle Officer, Dinara, Rohtas. 5. Shri Vineet Kumar, the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas, Sasaram. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Prabhat,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Government Pleader 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 7 16-01-2026 Though at the outset, the learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted that the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram has filed a show-cause stating therein that encroachment in question has stood removed, however the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the encroachment made by Ashok Ray and Kamlesh Ray have been removed but the encroachment made by Harendra Ray, Jagdish Ray and Birendra Ray are still to be removed, to the following extent :- (i) the authority have not touched the encroachment made by Harendra Ray, Patna High Court MJC No.3508 of 2023(7) dt.16-01-2026 2/2 (ii) partial encroachment made by Jagdish Ray i.e. boundary pillar at both end as also chapa kal with submersible motor beneath it has been left and (iii) the encroachment made by Birendra Ray, i.e. Septic Tank upon the public road has also been left. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted. 3. The petition stands disposed off. kanchan/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) U