D/L- 12 24/03/2026 Ct. No.-19 Aritra WPA 33 of 2026 Chandrakanta Gayen & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Anindya Sundar Das Mr. Shaunak Ghosh Ms. Paramita Mondal Ms. Suva Gayen Mr. Suman Halder Ms. Shabnam Yeasmin Mr. Anuvab Das Ms. Ankita Das ….for the petitioners Mr. Soumitra Bandopadhyay Mr. Subhasis Bandopadhyay ….for the State The learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits, on instructions, that the petitioners, who are cultivators could not state the correct facts while giving instruction to the learned advocate at the time of drafting of the writ petition. He submits that due to communication gap certain inadvertent mistakes crept in the writ petition. He, therefore, prays for leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Heard Mr. Bandopadhyay, learned advocate for the State, on such submission. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioners, WPA 33 of 2026 stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file afresh with correct facts. There will be no order as to costs. 2 All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)