Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:15188
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 443 of 2016 Muraiiram @ Murari S/o Kulanjan Sahu, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village
Jhalmala,
Tahsil
Balod,
District
Balod, Chhattisgarh ................Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant versus 1 - Kulanjan S/o Suklal, Aged About 82 Years R/o Village Jhalmala, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Santram S/o Kulanjan Sahu, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Jhalmala, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Shanti Bai W/o Bahursingh, Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Newarikala, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.04.02 16:10:12 +0530
2 4 - Smt. Chandrika W/o Milanram Sahu, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Orma, Tahsil Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Jamuna Bai W/o Kailash Sahu, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Parewadeeh, Tahsil Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh,
District
:
Dhamtari,
Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Sumita Bai W/o Rajendra Prasad Sahu, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Bathena, Tahsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 7 - The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh .................Defendants, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None For State : Shri Lekhram Dhruv, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri
Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order on Board 02.04.2026
1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal on repeated calls.
2. In view of the above, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the present matter.
3
3. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib