MOHAMMAD ASLAM S/O BASIR KHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4572/2026 · 2026-03-13
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4158 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4158 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10698] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4572/2026 Mohammad Aslam S/o Basir Khan, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Mohollah Karigaran Rana Ka Jaw, Sikar Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Department Of Primay Education, Jaipur
2. The Drector Education Elemantary Education Rajastahn, Bikaner Rajasthan.
3. The District Education Officer Elemantary Education, District Sikar Rajasthan
4. The Principal/ P.e.e.o. Government Senior Seconday School, Kasli District Sikar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 13/03/2026
1. This writ petitioner has been filed with following prayer:
"It is therefore prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate order or direction (i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction to made notional fixation of the present petitioner as per from date of initial joining from 06.10.2008 with all consequential benefits. (ii) And writ petition may kindly be disposed of as per
order dated 02.02.2024 (Annexure-8) in the interest of justice. (iii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem just and proper in the
facts of the present case may also be passed in favor of the petitioner. "
[2026:RJ-JP:10698] (2 of 2) [CW-4572/2026]
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although, the dispute period with regard to alleged absence from 20.01.2009 to 20.08.2018 has been regularized by the respondents vide order dated 14.02.2024 however, the notional benefits thereof has not been given to the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case, he is granted liberty to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 for redressing his grievances.
4. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before respondent No.2, who shall consider and decide the representation by a speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/32