- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50820 CA No. 253 of 2023 In COP No. 168 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 253 OF 2023 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.168 OF 2004 BETWEEN: THE MANGALORE CATHOLIC CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ST. ALOYSIUS COLLEGE ROAD, HAMPANAKATTA, MANGALORE - 575001 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SRI. SUNIL IVAN MENEZES. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S JANAMADHYAMA PRAKASHANA LIMITED (IN LIQN.) ATTACHED TO THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CORPORATE BHAVAN, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, NO.26-27, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.S.MAHADEVAN, ADVOCATE FOR OL) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 511 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50820 CA No. 253 of 2023 In COP No. 168 of 2004 THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant. When the case is called, the applicant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the Advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. 2. The application is listed today for orders regarding compliance of office objections. 3. A perusal of the papers reflects that the application was filed in 2023. We are completing the year 2025. The office objections are yet not complied with. It appears, the applicant is not interested in complying with the office objections. Further more, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant. Hence, the application is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11