Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41569 (CAL)

KALYAN KRISHNA NANDI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22809/2026 · 2026-09-18

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12. 12. 18.09.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 22809 OF 2026 SRI KALYAN KRISHNA NANDI VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Kalyan Krishna Nandi … Petitioner (In Person) Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, AAG Ms. Manju Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Madhu Jana, Adv. …For State 1. Matter is heard in presence of petitioner, who appears in person on virtual mode, and learned advocates representing State respondents. 2. Petitioner prays for direction upon the concerned police authority to register FIR based on complaint lodged. 3. Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, learned Additional Advocate General representing State respondents has opposed this writ petition relying upon order passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, North 24 Parganas dated 3rd July, 2026. 4. On perusal of order dated 3rd July, 2026, it appears that on an application under Section 175(3) BNSS/ 156(3) Cr.P.C. Court granted liberty to petitioner to approach learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bidhannagar, North 24 Parganas being jurisdictional Magistrate and vide said order dated 3rd July, 2026 application of petitioner was rejected. 5. In terms of order dated 3rd July, 2026, petitioner needs to approach jurisdictional Magistrate if complaint of petitioner is not transformed into an FIR. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of. [2] 7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)