IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80684 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2023 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Sonu @ Galjalla @ Nausad @ Galla S/o Md. Nasim R/o Dargah Chauraha, P.s.- Sultanganj, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagjit Roshan, Advocate Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to make necessary correction/s in paragraph No.3 of the bail application in course of the day. 3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 258 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 394 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 4. The prosecution case is based on the fardbayan of the informant, who alleged that while on his way in Patna for his M.Com examination, 2–3 unknown youths robbed him at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80684 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 gunpoint and snatched his mobile and bag. During the incident, one accused fired at him causing a gunshot injury to his leg, after which the assailants fled and he was taken to NMCH by the police. 5. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2024. Petitioner bears eight (8) criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application. 6. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co- accused, namely, Md. Khalil. There is no specific allegation of firing against the petitioner even in the case diary. Injury of the injured is though found to be grievous in nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 7. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80684 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 petitioner. 9. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 258 of 2023, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause. (III) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence or the witnesses during the trial. (IV) Petitioner shall not commit offence of similar nature in future. If any of the above conditions are violated, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Raj Kishore/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T