- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625242026 NC: 2026:KHC:51726 WP No. 28519 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.28519 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. CHETHAN P. TAYAL, S/O. LATE SRI N. K. TAYAL, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.4782, 16TH MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, MYSURU-570 017. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGENDRA NAIK R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571 401. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625242026 NC: 2026:KHC:51726 WP No. 28519 of 2026 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION, THYAGARAJA COLONY, PANDAVAPURA, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, SRIRANGAPATNA, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571438. 5. SRI. RAJU, S/O LATE SRI CHIKKAKEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT K.R.S. MAIN ROAD, BEECHANAKUPPE VILLAGE, BELAGOLA HOBLI, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT 571 607. 6. SRI. JAYARAMU, S/O LATE SRI CHIKKAKEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT K.R.S. MAIN ROAD, BEECHANAKUPPE VILLAGE, BELAGOLA HOBLI, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 607. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.04.2026 PASSED BY THE - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625242026 NC: 2026:KHC:51726 WP No. 28519 of 2026 RESPONDENT NO.2, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA, IN REVISION PETITION NO. 81/2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 28.04.2026 in R.P.No.81/2025 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2. 2. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the reasons assigned by respondent No.2 in the impugned order at Annexure-A would indicate that the matter has been remitted to respondent No.3 for fresh consideration in the light of the observation made therein as to verify original grant order, survey records etc., and respondent No.4 has been directed to maintain status-quo with regard to revenue entries till then. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010625242026 NC: 2026:KHC:51726 WP No. 28519 of 2026 3. In that view of the matter, since the matter has been remitted for reconsideration by respondent No.3, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31