Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
28 1166..0099..22002266 Ct. No.15 b.das
WPA 21727 of 2026
Badal Naskar
Vs.
The State of W.B. & Ors.
Mr. Shahan Shah Mr. Soumen Barman Mr. Sanjita Sarkar …for the petitioner.
Ms. Trisha Rakshit Ms. Aishwarya Datta …for respondent no.6.
Ms. Smita pal Mr. Pijus Kanti Ghoshal …for the State.
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. The Panchayat is not represented despite service. The petitioner alleges that the private respondent is raising unauthorized construction without obtaining sanction from the concerned Panchayat. The petitioner submitted a representation in this regard before the concerned authority on 29th July, 2026, which is yet to be considered. The petitioner seeks
consideration of the same.
Learned counsel for the private respondent denies and disputes the allegation raised by the petitioner. In view of the allegation raised by the petitioner, the Pradhan, Chandpur Chaitanyapur Gram Panchayat, being the 3rd respondent herein, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner
2 dated 29th July, 2026 within four weeks from the date of communication of this order upon granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to all concerned including the petitioner and the private respondent, in accordance with law. The decision taken by the authority shall be communicated to the parties within a week thereof. In the event the construction raised by the private respondent is found to be illegal/unauthorized, the concerned authority shall take necessary steps in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)