Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41524 (KAR)

SMT. PADMA v. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI

CRP/883/2025 · 2026-09-19

Lalitha Kanneganti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010770132025 NC: 2026:KHC:51414 CRP No.883/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.883 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SMT. PADMA W/O MAHADEVA AGED 55 YEARS R/AT NO.91/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD A CROSS, BYATARAYANAPURA MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560026. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADITYA S. KUMAR, ADV.,) AND: SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O CHATRANAYAK AGED 52 YEARS R/AT NO.1/4, 8TH CROSS OPPO. TO PAPANNA MUTTON STALL BYATARAYANAPURA, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE-560026. …RESPONDENT THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.2516/2023 PENDING BEFORE THE IX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-5). SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED ON I.A. FILED U/S 151 OF CPC (ANNEXURE-A) DATED 23.10.2025 AND Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010770132025 NC: 2026:KHC:51414 CRP No.883/2025 CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE IA FILED U/S 151 CPC SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE REVISION PETITIONER/DEFENDANT NO.3 IN O.S.NO.2516/2023 (ANNEXURE-B) FILED BEFORE THE HON’BLE THE IX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-5) BY TAKING THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED ALONG WITH IA U/S 151 OF CPC (ANNEXURE-C) & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The petitioner is questioning the order dated 23.10.2025, passed on an application in O.S.No.2516/2023, by the IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, whereby the trial Court rejected the application and refused to take the written statement on record. 2. The office has raised an objection with regard to maintainability of this Civil Revision Petition in view of Section 115 of the CPC on 12.12.2025. Office objections are sustained. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that there are no bonafides on the part of the petitioner in prosecuting the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010770132025 NC: 2026:KHC:51414 CRP No.883/2025 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not maintainable. i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18