Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4150 (UTT)

REKHA BHANDARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/461/2026 · 2026-02-27

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.461 of 2026 Rekha Bhandari ……Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …..Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mohit Bhauriyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Anil Dabral, learned Additional C.S.C. along with Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance for which the present writ petition was filed has now been redressed; therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 27.02.2026 AK