Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4150 (CHH)

SANDHYA SAHU v. DHARMENDRA SAHU

REVP/85/2026 · 2026-04-05

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(Rev.Pet.No.85/2026) 2026:CGHC:15674-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No.85 of 2026 {Arising out of judgment dated 4-2-2026 passed in FA(MAT) No.257/2023} Sandhya Sahu, aged about 37 years, W/o Dharmendra Sahu, R/o Behind Sangam Marriage Palace, Boriakhurd, P.S. Tikerapara, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus Dharmendra Sahu, aged about 43 years, S/o Banshi Lal Sahu, R/o Vivekanand Nagar, Street No.4, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Respondent Division Bench: - Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, JJ. Order (In Chamber) (06/04/2026) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 1. This review petition is filed for review/recall of judgment dated 4-2- 2026 passed by this Court in FA(MAT) No.257/2023 and it has been taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 (for short, ‘the Rules of 2007’). 2. We have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.04.07 14:12:46 +0530 (Rev.Pet.No.85/2026) 3. After going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the judgment under review, we do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of judgment dated 4-2-2026 passed by this Court in FA(MAT) No.257/2023. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the judgment under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Judge Soma