Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41474 (PAT)

Sudish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./79257/2025 · 2026-01-05

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79257 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2025 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Sudish Kumar S/O Krishna Ray Resident of village - shitalpur pirganj, ward no.- 09, police station - Dighwara, District - Saran 2. Sunil Kumar S/O Krishna Ray Resident of village - shitalpur pirganj, ward no.- 09, police station - Dighwara, District - Saran. 3. Anand Kumar S/O Krishna Ray Resident of village - shitalpur pirganj, ward no.- 09, police station - Dighwara, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 243 of 2025, instituted under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners along with F.I.R. named accused persons intercepted the informant while he was going on duty and assaulted him. Petitioner no. 2 caught hold the informant and Petitioner No. 1 assaulted the informant with sword causing injury. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79257 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case for the same occurrence. Counter case was filed by the accused Krishna Ray. Both parties are neighbours and they have compromised. Injury on the injured is simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Petitioners undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. I, Saran at Chapra/ concerned Court in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 243 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) U T