Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41454 (PAT)

Bikram Pratap Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./89148/2025 · 2026-02-13

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89148 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64999 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Bikram Pratap Chaudhary Son of Barun Kumar Chaudahry Resident of 46, New Khajasarai Laheriasarai, Distt -Darbhanga Bihar and Presently Residing At RZF-1/24B, Gali No. 2, Mahavir Enclave, Palam, Dwarka, New Delhi 110045 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Anupriya Wife of Bikram Pratap choudhary Resident of 14-B, Rajiv nagar, Patna, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Puneet Siddhartha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Anjani Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present modification application has been preferred to modify the order dated 08.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.64999 of 2024. 3. The present case is one Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 4. The parties had come to an agreement for filing a mutual consent divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act on certain terms and conditions incorporated in the order dated 08.05.2025. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89148 of 2025(3) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 5. It is submitted that those terms and conditions are not being strictly complied with. In such view of the matter, the parties to the proceedings would be free to contest the case on merits and take recourse of other remedies available in law. However, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 08.05.2025 would still stand even in changed circumstances. 6. Accordingly, this modification application stands disposed of. Trivedi/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T