- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628602026 NC: 2026:KHC:53141-DB WP No. 28616 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.28616 OF 2026 (GM-MM_S) BETWEEN: M/S SENSATION MAHESHWARA INFRA PROJECTS LLP (LLP IN: AAQ-7766), #8/2/616/1, 4TH FLOOR, SHOP 3B, SAHA BUILDING, NEAR HOTEL MINERVA GRAND, BANJARA HILLS, ROAD NO.11 HYDERABAD, TELANGANA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SMT. DEEPIKA JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR MR. SANDEEP LAHIRI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES (MINES AND GEOLOGY), VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628602026 NC: 2026:KHC:53141-DB WP No. 28616 of 2026 3. THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE NOTICE DATED 21.07.2026 BEARING NO.GABHUE/HIBHUBENGRAAJI/NOTICE/2026-27/1239 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3, VIDE ANNEXURE A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the notice dated 21.07.2026, whereby, it is alleged that the petitioner has excavated 82,940 metric tonnes of soil in excess of the - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628602026 NC: 2026:KHC:53141-DB WP No. 28616 of 2026 quantity permitted and has, accordingly, been called upon to pay the penalty as prescribed in Schedule I-C of the Karnataka Sub- Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 [KMMC Rules]. The petitioner has further been put to notice that, in the event of failure to pay the penalty, action would be initiated in accordance with the rules. 3. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no opportunity was afforded to the petitioner to address the allegations made in the impugned notice. He states that the petitioner is willing to pay the amount determined, if it is ultimately found that the petitioner has excavated soil in excess of the permitted quantity. He, however, submits that the allegation that the petitioner has excavated 82,940 metric tonnes of soil in excess of the permitted quantity is factually erroneous. 4. The learned Government Advocate submits that the notice dated 21.07.2026 is in the nature of a show cause notice and that the amount of penalty has not yet been quantified. He submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file a response to the said show cause notice, which would be considered by the competent authority. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628602026 NC: 2026:KHC:53141-DB WP No. 28616 of 2026 5. We note that the petitioner has also submitted representations prior to the issuance of the impugned notice. However, notwithstanding the same, we consider it apposite to direct that the impugned notice dated 21.07.2026 be treated as a show-cause notice. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to submit his response to the impugned notice and place all relevant materials before the concerned authority. 6. It is clarified that the petitioner shall not be precluded from contesting any of the allegations made in the impugned notice, including the allegation that the petitioner has excavated soil in excess of the permitted quantity. 7. If such response is submitted within a period of two weeks from date, the concerned authority shall consider the same and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. 8. We also clarify that, if the concerned authority considers it apposite, it is not precluded from conducting a fresh inspection. The impugned notice shall not stand in the way of such inspection. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010628602026 NC: 2026:KHC:53141-DB WP No. 28616 of 2026 9. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE MBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4