Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41449 (KAR)

SMT. NAGAMMA v. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER

MFA/4786/2017 · 2026-09-19

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010323692017 NC: 2026:KHC:51534 MFA No. 4786 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4786 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O. LATE BETTAPPA @ ABBANNA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. 2. SRI B. SOMA SHEKAR S/O. LATE BETTAPPA @ ABBANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 3. SRI B. PRAKASH S/O. LATE BETTAPPA @ ABBANNA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.31/1 KOTHANURU VILLAGE UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE - 560 076. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI ADINARAYAN AND M/S. ANN ASSTS., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE BEGUR ROAD BOMMANAHALLI ZONE BANGALORE - 560 068. 2. THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE Digitally signed by VINUTHA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010323692017 NC: 2026:KHC:51534 MFA No. 4786 of 2017 ANJANAPURA SUB-DIVISION BANGALORE - 560 108. 3. SRI P.S.SRINIVASAN S/O. LATE T. SHAMIYENGAR AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.5 RANGA MANDIRAM NANJAPPA ROAD SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI AMIT DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 104 AND ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) READ WITH ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.04.2017 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 IN O.S.NO.7533/2016 BY XXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellants and learned counsel or respondents are present. 2. Learned counsel for appellants submits that the original suit before the trial Court has been disposed of on - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010323692017 NC: 2026:KHC:51534 MFA No. 4786 of 2017 27.01.2025. Hence, the present appeal would not survive for consideration any more. Accepting the said submission, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and the same pales into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1