Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41445 (KAR)

SHREYAS PACHAGIRI R v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/9042/2025 · 2026-09-17

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010417812025 NC: 2026:KHC:50998 CRL.P No. 9042 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9042 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SHREYAS PACHAGIRI R AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O RAMESH P.A 2. RAMESH P.A AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O (LATE) ASWATHANARAYANA SWAMY 3. GAYATHRI DEVI. R AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, W/O RAMESH P.A PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDENT OF NO.47-48, 3RD BLOCK, AKKALAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGARA, BENGALURU -560 016. 4. SUKRUTHA PACHAGIRI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, W/O PRADEEP KUMAR.M 5. PRADEEP KUMAR. M AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O MURALI KRISHNA PETITIONER NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF NO.22, Digitally Signed By: SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ 25/09/2026, 16:44, BENGALURU Verified - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010417812025 NC: 2026:KHC:50998 CRL.P No. 9042 of 2025 SLV NILAYA, MANNAM NAGAR LAYOUT, VINAYAKA TEMPLE, ANANDPURA, T C PALYA POST, BENGALURU - 560 036. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. TEJAS.H.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY EAST ZONE WOMEN POLICE, BENGALURU REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. SHWETHA. R, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, W/O SHREYAS PACHAGIRI. R R/AT NO.64, SRI LAKSHMINARASIMHA SWAMY NILAYA, N.R.I LAYOUT, 2ND PHASE, 4TH B ROAD, NEAR K.M GARDEN, BENGALURU 560 043. ALSO AT SHWETHA. R, W/O SHREYAS PACHAGIRI.R, RESIDING AT NO.60, BALAPPA REDDY ROAD, NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE, K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU 560 036. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RANJITH KUMAR N., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. M.R. SWAROO., ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally Signed By: SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ 25/09/2026, 16:44, BENGALURU Verified - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010417812025 NC: 2026:KHC:50998 CRL.P No. 9042 of 2025 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CR.NO.87/2024 REGISTERED BY THE EAST ZONE WOMEN POLICE, BENGALURU/RESPONDENT NO.1, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498(A),504,506,34 OF IPC, U/S 3 AND 4 D.P ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE 11th ACMM COURT, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: "The petitioners who are arrayed as accused No.1 to 5 humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the First Information Report and Compliant in Crime No.87/2024 registered by the East Zone Women Police, Bengaluru/respondent No.1, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, now the case is pending on the file of the Hon'ble 11th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court (11 ACMM) Mayohall, Bengaluru, in the interest of justice." Digitally Signed By: SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ 25/09/2026, 16:44, BENGALURU Verified - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010417812025 NC: 2026:KHC:50998 CRL.P No. 9042 of 2025 2. A joint memo has been filed signed by the petitioners and respondent No.2 which reads as under: "i. That, due to matrimonial differences between the 1st petitioner and the respondent No.2 and the 2nd respondent approached the 1st respondent police with a complaint, who registered a case in their Crime No.87/2024 for the offences punishable under sections 498(A), 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act against the petitioners and pending on the file of the Hon'ble XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru. ii. That the petitioners have filed the above petition seeking quashing of the First Information Report and Complaint before this Hon'ble Court, meantime, petitioner No.1 and the 2nd respondent at the intervention of their family members, well-wishers and friends agreed to settle all their differences, accordingly filed the Memorandum of Settlement in Crl.Misc.No.107/2024 before the Hon'ble Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-I, Bengaluru, and both obeying the same and Crl.Misc.No.729/2025 pending before the Hon'ble I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, the 2nd respondent undertake to withdraw the same. Digitally Signed By: SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ 25/09/2026, 16:44, BENGALURU Verified - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010417812025 NC: 2026:KHC:50998 CRL.P No. 9042 of 2025 iii. That the 1st petitioner and the 2nd respondent agreed to reside as a dutiful husband and wife without any conditions, to become dutiful parents for their child and undertake to resolve their problems by mutual discussions in future and not to blame or drag the family members in their matrimonial life. iv. The 2nd respondent had approached the 1st respondent due to difference between herself and the 1st petitioner as such allegations made against each other are withdrawn. The 1st petitioner and the 2nd respondent amicably settled their differences on the advice of the well-wishers without undue influence, coercion, threat etc." 3. The dispute between petitioner No.1/ husband and respondent No.2 having arisen out of matrimonial proceedings, at the instance of well-wishers, they submit that they have resolved all their disputes and that they would be living together as husband and wife amicably. The father and mother of petitioner No.1/ husband, namely petitioner No.2 and petitioner No.3, also submit that they would endeavour to see that the petitioner and respondent No.2 live in a harmonious manner. Digitally Signed By: SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ 25/09/2026, 16:44, BENGALURU Verified - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010417812025 NC: 2026:KHC:50998 CRL.P No. 9042 of 2025 4. On enquiry, all of them submit that they have signed the joint memo of their own accord without any undue influence or coercion. The father and mother of respondent No.2 who are also present before this Court, submit that they will also endeavour to facilitate the husband and wife to live in a harmonious married relationship. 4. All their submissions are placed on record. 5. In view of the settlement having been arrived at, this Court passes the following: ORDER i. The Criminal Petition is allowed. ii. First Information report in Crime No.87/2024 registered by East Zone Women Police Station, Bengaluru City pending on the file of XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru, is hereby quashed. Digitally Signed By: SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ 25/09/2026, 16:44, BENGALURU Verified - 7 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010417812025 NC: 2026:KHC:50998 CRL.P No. 9042 of 2025 iii. All the parties are present in person, they have been identified by their respective counsels. (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE TIN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25 Digitally Signed By: SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ 25/09/2026, 16:44, BENGALURU Verified