GOPAL KRISHAN BHARDWAJ v. M/S EAKTA ENTERPRISES AND ORS.
CRM-M/17485/2026 · 2026-04-01
Aman Chaudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4144 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4144 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 164
CRM-M-17485-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision: 01.04.2026 GOPAL KRISHAN BHARDWAJ
... Petitioner
Versus M/S EAKTA ENTERPRISES AND ORS.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was not the Director on the date of issuance of cheque, he having resigned prior thereto, for which reference is made to Annexure P3 and judgment of this Court in Anil Chanana vs. M/s Gyani Ram Ruliya Ram I.L.R. Punjab & Haryana 2018(2) 872, however, after arguing for some time, when faced with the fact that the case is now fixed for defence evidence, prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to take all pleas available to him before the Court concerned at the appropriate stage, in accordance with law.
2.
Ordered accordingly.
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 01.04.2026
JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.04.01 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document