- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010497672017 NC: 2026:KHC:51571 MFA No. 7439 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7439 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. PREMAKUMARI W/O. SRI. KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.27, 5TH MAIN, 1ST CROSS, H.V.R. LAYOUT, OPP. CHECK POST, MAGADI ROAD, VIJAYANAGARA NORTH, BANGALORE - 560 079. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. GEETHALAKSHMI. D W/O. SRI. NARAYANAGOWDA K.V., AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 667, 3RD MAIN, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, BANGALORE-560 060. Digitally signed by VINUTHA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010497672017 NC: 2026:KHC:51571 MFA No. 7439 of 2017 2. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. LATE CHINNAPPA, MAJOR, 3. SRI. MUNIYAPPA S/O. LATE CHINNAPPA, MAJOR, 4. SMT. NEELAMMA W/O. SRI. MUNIYAPPA, MAJOR, RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE R/OF KENGERI VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 039. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 28.06.2017 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S.NO.1742/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING IA NO.1 FILED U/O. 39 RULE 1&2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010497672017 NC: 2026:KHC:51571 MFA No. 7439 of 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT The present appeal is of the year 2017. It is seen that the suit is of the year 2017. 2. This appeal is filed challenging the order passed on IA.No.1 filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC in O.S.No.1742/2017 by the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. 3. There is no interim order granted by this Court. Learned counsel for the appellant has not moved his little finger from 2017 to even take steps to the counsel appearing for the respondents before the trial Court. Not bothered to take steps despite three times notice being returned with insufficient address. I do not find any good ground or cogent reason to grant further adjournment. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5