Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4143 (ALL)

PRADEEP KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/6394/2026 · 2026-05-06

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6394 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Adarsh Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Tanu Roopanwal, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. Learned counsel for parties, at the outset, submit that the controversy involve in present writ petition is squarely covered by a judgment passed by this Court in Shanker Prasad Yadav and others vs. State of U.P. and others, 2026:AHC:68346, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of judgment passed by this Court in Shanker Prasad Yadav (supra). May 7, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Singh, Adarsh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Pradeep Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad