Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010639832026 NC: 2026:KHC:51725 WP No. 29392 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.29392 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SHIVA REDDY S/O BHARATHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT PALYA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASPUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563126. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. CHARISHMA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. L. VENKATARAMA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR SRINIVASPUR TALUK,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010639832026 NC: 2026:KHC:51725 WP No. 29392 of 2026
SRINIVASPURA, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 135. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH MUTATION ENTRY DATED 23-10-2025 AS PE ANNEXURE F VIDE M.R. NO.T7 / 2025-2026, AND RTC OF THE YEAR 2025-2026 AS PER ANNEXURE G, PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, by referring to the interim
order dated 02.03.2026 passed in W.P.No.6739/2026, contended that this Court has granted
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010639832026 NC: 2026:KHC:51725 WP No. 29392 of 2026
interim order staying the order dated 02.05.2025 in LND SCST 46/2023, impugned in this Writ Petition.
3. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the petitioner is having efficacious remedy under S.136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.
4. In that view of the matter, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Sec.136(2) and urge the very same contentions before the competent authority.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not maintainable. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35