Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4142 (GAU)

PABAN DOLEY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Bail Appln./676/2026 · 2026-03-26

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010047722026 2026:GAU-AS:4406 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./676/2026 PABAN DOLEY SON OF- SRI BAPARAM DOLEY, RESIDENT OF- VILLAGE- GOSSAIPUKHURI, POLICE STATION- NARAYANPUR, DISTRICT -LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. 2:SMTI. RENUMAI PEGU WIFE OF- SRI DALIRAM PEGU RESIDENT OF- VILLAGE- MAJGAON DIGHALIA POLICE STATION- NARAYANPUR DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. DITUL DAS, MR. B J TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR B CHANDA(R2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 27-03-2026 Heard Mr. D. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Page No.# 2/3 Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam for the State respondent and Mr. B. Chanda, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2. 2. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 has been filed by the petitioner namely, Paban Doley, seeking bail in connection with Sessions (Special)/Special (POCSO) Case No.194/ 2025 under Sections 64(2)(f)/64(2)(m)/65(1)/351(2) of BNS read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, arising out of Narayanpur P.S. Case No.57/2025, which is pending in the Court of learned Special Judge (POCSO), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur. 3. As per allegation, the petitioner was in a love relationship with the alleged victim, who was aged about 16-17 years at the time of occurrence and established physical relationship with her. 4. The I.O. has completed the investigation and submitted charge-sheet, after which, trial commenced. In course of trial, the informant as well as the victim have been examined and none of them have implicated the present petitioner and they were declared hostile. In the meantime, the petitioner has been behind the bars for 175 days. 5. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail is allowed. 6. Accordingly, it is provided that the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand) with 1(one) surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Page No.# 3/3 (POCSO), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur in connection with the aforementioned case. 7. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused petitioner – (1) shall regularly participate in the trial ; and (2) shall not try to influence the witnesses of the case. 8. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant