Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41395 (KAR)

MR. SYED RAFEEQ v. SMT. K. R. SATYAVATI

CRP/351/2026 · 2026-09-18

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010241012026 NC: 2026:KHC:51155 CRP No. 351 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 351 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. MR. SYED RAFEEQ SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS HALEEMA SADIYA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. D/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ. 2. SYED SHAROOQ. AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. S/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ. 3. ASIYA TARANUM AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, D/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ. 4. ABEAD MAAZ, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ, 5. MRS. MUNEERA BANO. W/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.301, RETUL APARTMENT, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010241012026 NC: 2026:KHC:51155 CRP No. 351 of 2026 2ND FLOOR, ARMUGAM CIRCLE, BASAVANGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.S. MUKARRAM, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. K. R. SATYAVATI W/O A. S. PATTABIRAMAN, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. SRI. A. S. PATTABIRAMAN S/O A. B. SUBRAMANYAM. AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.607/A, 1ST MAIN ROAD, E BLOCK, II STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.01.2026, PASSED IN OS NO. 5254/2018 ON IA NO. 9 PASSED BY THE XXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE A AND CONSEQUENTLY BY DISMISS THE APPLICATION AND GRANT SUCH OTHER INCIDENTAL RELIEF, WHICH THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010241012026 NC: 2026:KHC:51155 CRP No. 351 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Office has raised the objection with regard to maintainability. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to convert this Civil Revision Petition into writ petition. Accordingly, the petitioners are permitted to convert this Civil Revision Petition into writ petition within a period of two weeks from today. 3. For all statistical purposes, the civil revision petition is disposed of. 4. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29