IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14799 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2025 Thana- SALIMPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Sunil Kumar Son of Dinesh Ray Resident of Village - Saidpur, Ps- Salimpur, Dist- Patna 2. Rajnandan Ray @ Rajnandan Kumar Son of Dinesh Ray Resident of Village - Saidpur, Ps- Salimpur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 3 29-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Salimpur P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 126(2) of BNS. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 19.10.2025 at about 03:00 P.M., while measurement of a street was being carried out by an Amin for construction purposes, the accused persons including the petitioner arrived at the place of occurrence, abused the informant and assaulted him with lathi, danda, bricks and stones. It is alleged that petitioner assaulted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14799 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026 2/3 the informant with lathi causing injury on his head. When the informant’s son, Gautam Kumar, intervened to save him, co- accused Rajnandan Kumar also assaulted him with lathi. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated. They are the persons of clean antecedent. There was previous enmity between the parties. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. The informant and the petitioners are family members and it appears that the alleged incident took place due to sudden provocation for construction of street. Both the petitioners are said to have assaulted the victims, but it has not led to any serious injury. The nature of injury of the victims has been described as simple in nature. Both the petitioners have clean antecedents. Under these circumstances, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Let the petitioners, as named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-1st Barh, Patna in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14799 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026 3/3 with Salimpur P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and subject to further condition that :- (i) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation/ trial. (ii) The learned Court below would, however, verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the Court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, it is expected that the verification process would be done expeditiously without causing any delay. kundan/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U T