CHANDRAKANT SHRIPATRAO SAVANGIKAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/6320/2024 · 2026-08-17
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4139 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4139 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 103-WP-10072-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10072 OF 2026 PRAKASH RAJARAM PATIL AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State ...
WRIT PETITION NO. 6320 OF 2024 CHANDRAKANT SHRIPATRAO SAVANGIKAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for Respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO.10405 OF 2026 HARIDASAN GOVINDAN KANNOLI AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sandip R. Andhale, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for Respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO.10406 OF 2026 VISHNU DATTATRAO KARLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO. 10407 OF 2026 DEVIDAS SUKDEO SURYAWANSHI AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondents/State … SVH 2026:BHC-AUG:37872-DB
2 103-WP-10072-26.odt WRIT PETITION NO. 10408 OF 2026 NAYAB RAOJI PAWDE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondents/State …
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :
1. Indisputably, the issue raised in these petitions is squarely covered by the orders passed by this Court [Coram: Mangesh S. Patil and Sandeep V. Marne, JJ.], in Writ Petition No.9967 of 2021 and connected matters and [Coram: Ravindra V. Ghuge and Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ.] in Writ Petition No.10947 of 2022.
2. For the reasons stated in the said orders, the Writ Petitions are disposed of with the declaration that Government Resolution dated 24th August, 2017 would apply prospectively. The Petitioners are held to be eligible for grant of advance increments for outstanding work, prior to 24.08.2017. Since the Petitioners are not claiming interest, all consequential benefits be calculated by adding up the said advance increments. Since some of the Petitioners have superannuated, all consequential benefits post recalculation, be paid to the Petitioners within 90 days.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH