IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14811 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2025 Thana- Chhaudahi District- Begusarai ====================================================== Md. Abdul Ahad @ Bhola S/O Late Mazid Hussain Resident of village- Sawant, Ward No. 13 PS- Chhaurahi, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Chaitanya Swaroop, Adv. For the State : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP For the informant : Mr. Randhir Kumar No.1., Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 3 29-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chhaurahi P.S. Case No. 182 of 2025, registered for the offence under sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109 (1), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and U/s-27 of the Arms Act. 3. According to the prosecution case, the informant, Nazrana Khatoon, stated that while her son Abid was on his way to Md. Shamim's shop to purchase rations, she heard an outcry Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14811 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026 2/4 coming from the residence of Md. Bhola. Upon stepping outside, she witnessed the accused Md. Abdul Ahad (alias Bhola), Md. Taj Hasan, Md. Kurban, and Md. Rehan armed with lathis, rods, and farsas, attacking her son’s head. When Abdul Ahad @ Bhola) was confronted during the altercation, he assaulted Md. Athar Imam with a rod and farsa, causing a head injury that rendered him unconscious. Furthermore, when Md. Anzar attempted to intervene, he was assaulted with lathis by Md. Taj Hasan, Md. Kurban, and Md. Rehan, resulting in another head injury. Subsequently, Md. Shamsher, Md. Noor Alam, Gulsher, and Md. Naimutullah arrived brandishing firearms and firing shots into the air. Accordingly the FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent, has committed no offence, and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that although there is an allegation that the petitioner assaulted Md. Athar Imam on the head, the injury sustained was simple in nature. Learned counsel further contends that the petitioner has been dragged into the present case due to previous enmity, and it is a counter-blast to Chhaurahi P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025. Regarding the three criminal antecedents mentioned in paragraph-3, the petitioner has been acquitted in two cases and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14811 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026 3/4 is currently on bail in the third. 5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. There is allegation against the petitioner of having assaulted Md. Athar Imam on the head, but the same has resulted in simple injury. Out of three criminal antecedents as mentioned in paragraph-3 of the application, the petitioner has been acquitted in two of them and in the third case the petitioner is said to be on bail. Under these circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Manjhauli (Begusarai) in connection with Chhaurahi P.S. Case No. 182 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with following conditions: (i) the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation/trial. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14811 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026 4/4 (ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process would be done expeditiously without causing any delay. Prakash Narayan (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U T