IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85748 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Rishav Raj @ Rishav Kumar S/o- Manoj Prasad @ Manoj Kumar Mohalla - Chaklokman Gudari Bazar Gola Patti ward no. 12, P. S. - Dalsingsarai Dist. - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 15-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No.305/2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 132, 223, 121(2), 121(1), 74, 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that she along with police force had come to Gudri Bazar in connection with investigation of Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No.291/2025, when Manoj along with his family members started misbehaving with the police and the petitioner along with Manoj caught the informant and torn her dress and even Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85748 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 scratched her with nails and the petitioner tried to snatch her pistol, on arrival of more force, some accused were apprehended while petitioner along with some other accused fled. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then informant suffered simple injury. It is next submitted that petitioner was returning from his coaching when he saw force at his house misbehaving with his family members, as such he dissuaded the informant and the force from entering his house and thus an altercation took place in between both the sides. It is next submitted that allegation of tearing clothes and nailing the informant is exaggerated. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that though it has been submitted that petitioner was coming from coaching and is a student but then no documentary evidence on record to substantiate the said submission. It is further submitted that informant is a lady police officer and she specifically alleges that petitioner tore her clothes and nailed her and even tried to snatch her pistol. It is next submitted that investigation Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85748 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 in the case is continuing. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP and taking into consideration that petitioner has antecedent of three cases, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T