Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41353 (KAR)

ASHRAF A.S. v. VIKAS

MFA/5655/2015 · 2026-09-22

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE 2016 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHAR MFA.No.5655 OF 2015 (MV) BETWEEN: ASHRAF A.S SON OF SULAIMAN AGED ABOUT YEARS RESIDENT OF NELLI HUDIKERI SIDDAPURA KODAGU DISTRICT ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY, ADV.) AND: 1. VIKAS SON OF RAVI NAIKA AGED 6 YEARS SINCE, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN/MOTHER HEMAVATHY, WIFE OF RAVI NAIKA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS RESIDENT OF PALLIDADKA HOUSE BELAL VILLAGE BELTHANGADY TALUK (D.K.) 2. NARAYANA POOJARY AGED MAJOR SON OF VENKAPPA POOJARY RESIDENT OF DHARMASHREE NILAYA KUKKAVU MITHABAGILU VILLAGE BELTHANGADY TALUK 3. THE MANAGER ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD O-CODE 422801 IN FRONT OF TOWN HALL 1ST FLOOR, MADIKERI ... RESPONDENTS 2 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:11.07.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.536/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT, BELTHANGADY, AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF RS. 3,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL PAYMENT. THIS MFA COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT On 04.12.2015, peremptory order has been passed granting four weeks’ time for complying with the office objections failing which, it was ordered that the appeal shall stand dismissed. However, as on today, the office objections have not been complied with. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of dismissal of main appeal, I.A.No.1/2015 filed for seeking stay is also dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE HJ