Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41339 (KAR)

SRI HOMBALEGOWDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/10634/2025 · 2026-09-17

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010221122025 NC: 2026:KHC:50824 WP No. 10634 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 10634 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI HOMBALEGOWDA S/O LATE CHIKKA GOOLIGOWDA, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS LR SAVITHRAMMA W/O LATE HOMBALEGOWDA AGED 63 YEARS R/AT RAMPURA VILLAGE, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK - 560 036 2. RAMESH H S/O LATE HOMBALEGOWDA AGED 52 YEARS R/AT RAMPURA VILLAGE, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK - 560 036 3. SWAMI H S/O LATE HOMBALEGOWDA AGED 50 YEARS R/AT RAMPURA VILLAGE, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK - 560 036 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIDDAPPA V.D., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010221122025 NC: 2026:KHC:50824 WP No. 10634 of 2025 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY HCGP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001 BESAGARAHALLI POLICE STATION 2. THE TAHSILDAR AND TALUK EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, MADDUR TALUK OFFICE, MADDUR TALUK OFFICE, 3. SRI R.P. NAVEENKUMAR, S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O RAMPURA VILLAGE, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURYA MUKUNDARAJ, APP FOR R1 AND R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER DTD. 12.10.2023 PASSED IN CRL. R.P. 06/2023 BY THE LD. II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA VIDE ANNX-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010221122025 NC: 2026:KHC:50824 WP No. 10634 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo. Memo reads as under: “Undersigned counsel for petitioner in the case permitted to withdraw and liberty to fresh petition in the above case in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Placing the memo on record, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for to settle the civil rights before the appropriate Civil Court in accordance with law. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25