Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41334 (CAL)

BISHTUPADA PRADHAN v. ATASHI NANDY

CO/1805/2026 · 2026-09-17

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 17.09.2026 (A 211) (S. Banerjee) CO 1805 of 2026 Sri Bhshtupada Pradhan Vs. Smt. Atashi Nandy Mr. Abhilash Chatterjee …for the opposite-party This matter was mentioned by the learned advocate for the petitioner citing urgency. Considering the urgency pleaded, this matter was upgraded. However, when this matter is called on, none appears to represent the petitioner, no accommodation has been sought for either. The opposite-party is represented by its learned advocate. Accordingly, this civil revisional application stands dismissed for default. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)