Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41329 (CAL)

RAJIB CHAKRABORTY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

WPA/4561/2010 · 2026-09-18

Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18.09.2026 Ct. No.655 Sl. No. 25 Subadip WPA 4561 of 2010 Rajib Chakraborty Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Kaushik Chatterjee, Mr. Tirthankar Dey. (V.C.)` …for the respondent nos. 7-14 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Advocate representing the respondents/HDFC Bank is present through virtual mode. 3. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed further with the present case. 4. Accordingly, the instant case be and the same is hereby dismissed for default. 5. No order as to costs. 6. Connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on payment of requisite fees. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.) 2