Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4131 (ORI)

RINARANI MOHANTY v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/10883/2026 · 2026-04-24

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 10883 of 2026 Rinarani Mohanty ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 24.04.2026 Order No. 02 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore most humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to regularise the services of the petitioner from 18.02.2014 i.e. on completion of six years of service as a Staff Nurse in terms of the govt. resolution dtd:17.09.2013 under Annexure-2 upon modifying her orders of regularization dtd:15.01.2021 dtd:22.01.2021 under Annexure-4 & 5 respectively and to grant all consequential service and financial benefits including seniority and promotion within a stipulated period as deem fit and proper; And/or pass any other writ/writs, order/orders/direction/directions in the fitness of the case. And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.” Page 2 of 2. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though highlighting her grievances, Petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-7 to the Writ Petition before the Opp. Party No. 1, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No. 1 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period. 5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No. 1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha