Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4131 (CAL)

DIPTIMAN CHAKRABORTY AND OTHERS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/2388/2024 · 2026-02-09

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09.02.2026 Court No.42 Item No.16 Sudipta CRR 2388 of 2024 With CRAN 2 of 2025 CRAN 3 of 2025 Diptiman Chakraborty & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Kanai Lal Mondal Mr. Abdus Salam Ms. Priya Halder Ms. Pallabi Mondal Mrs. Kalpana Bose …for the petitioners Mr. Jaydeep Biswas Mr. Sachit Talukdar …for the State Mr. Navanil De Ms. Monami Mukherjee …for the opposite party no.2 1. Present petition has been filed for quashing of chargesheet being no. 419 / 23 in connection with the First Information Report of Uttarpara Police Station FIR No. 366/23 dated 11.10.2023 under Sections 498A / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, corresponding to GR No. 2614 / 23. Initially the interim order was passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.05.2025. 2. During the course of the proceedings, learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly submitted that an appropriate direction may be issued to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the proceedings relating to the framing of charge. 2 3. Learned counsel seeks liberty to file an application for discharge before the learned Trial Court. 4. Liberty granted. 5. Learned Trial Court is requested to dispose of the discharge application filed by the petitioner expeditiously after giving notice to both the parties in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months. 6. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. 7. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 8. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)