1 D/L 424 17.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2165 of 2026 XXXX Vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Hingalganj Police Station Case No. 172 of 2026 dated 30.05.2026 under Sections 65(2)/64(2)(i)/64(j)/351(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act And In the matter of : XXXX ……Petitioner. Mr. Himadri Kumar Mahato Mr. Kunal Ganguly Mr. Subhodip Maity …for the Petitioner Mr. Rajashree V. Kundalia …for the State 1. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court be kept with the record. 2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about 100 days. Charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court. As such, petitioner be released on bail. 3. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and produces the Case Diary and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the minor girls under Section 183 of the BNSS. Additionally attention of the Court has been drawn to the medico legal examination report. 2 4. Having considered the overall materials appearing in the case diary I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for releasing the petitioner on bail. As such prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. 5. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 2165 of 2026 is dismissed. 6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)