Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4130 (CHH)

GURPREET SINGH CHHABRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1596/2026 · 2026-04-08

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16455 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1596 of 2026 1 - Gurpreet Singh Chhabra S/o Shri Sardar Harcharan Singh Chhabra Aged About 41 Years R/o Kelkarpara, Station Road, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Amarjeet Kaur Chhabra W/o Shri Sardar Harcharan Singh Chhabra Aged About 57 Years R/o Kelkarpara, Station Road, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Indravati Bhavan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Learned Rent Control Officer Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Nitin Kedia S/o Shri Kamal Kumar Kedia Aged About (Not Mentioned In Order Sheet), Proprietorship Firm Kamal Hardware R/o Station Road, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Neelam Kedia W/o Shri Amit Kedia Aged About 37 Years Proprietorship Firm Kamal Hardware R/o Station Road, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS} For Petitioners : Mr. Vimal Pathak, Advocate. For Resp. No. 1 to 3 : Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Addl. Advocate General. (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 09/04/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to be issued to respondent No. 2 - Rent Control Officer, Raipur to decide the Rent Control Case No. 97-90 (6), Year 2021-2022 within specific period. 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aforesaid Rent Control Case is pending before respondent No. 2 since 2022, despite that the same has not been decide yet, therefore, he prays that this petition may be disposed of directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Rent Control Case within specific time frame. 3. Learned State Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3 has no objection to allow the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Having considered the limited prayer of the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2- Rent Control Officer, Raipur, District Raipur to decide the Rent Control Case as early as possible preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt / submission of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations & directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending interlocutory application (s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2026.04.10 12:52:51 +0530