] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:1874 BA1 No.301 of 2026 Javed Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mrs. Sheetal learned, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present bail application is filed by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.20 of 2026 for the offence punishable under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act, Police Station Banbhulpura, District Nainital. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was apprehended with the non commercial quantity of smack i.e. weighting 8.92 grams. 6. Leaned State counsel opposed the bail application with the statement that applicant has a criminal history and thus he should not be enlarged on bail. 7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the said matter the applicant has been enlarged on bail and no conviction order has been passed so far. 8. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the present bail application and considering the facts and circumstance of the case, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 9. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Javed be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 18.03.2026 Arti