1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.968/2016 BETWEEN: SMT.T.P.GAYATHRI W/O T.V.PRASANNA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PROPRIETRIX: M/S PRAGATHI INVESTMENTS, SHOP NO.2, T.V.COMPLEX B.V.K IYENGAR ROAD BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI T.V.NARAYANA MURTHY ...APPELLANT (BY SRI VISHALAXA KADIWAL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI K.T.SRINIVAS S/O THIRUMALACHAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. SMT.USHA SRINIVAS W/O SRI K.T.SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT M/S V.B.BAKERY SAJJAN RAO CIRCLE, V.V.PURAM BENGALURU – 560 004 ALSO AT: NO.56, GOVINDAPPA ROAD BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU – 560 004 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAMACHANDRA G.BHAT, ADVOCATE) 2 THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.03.2016 PASSED BY XXIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XX ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE (SCCH-24), BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.28565/2007 ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT On last occasion, the appellant and her Counsel remained absent. Today also there is no representation. Hence, it appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE KSR